Then we run the command git merge new-branch to merge the new feature into the master branch. Once the feature is complete, the branch can be merged back into the main code branch.įirst we run git checkout master to change the active branch back to the master branch. This will change the active branch to the new branch: $ git checkout new-branchĪt this point, commits can be made on the new branch to implement the new feature. To start working on the new branch we first need to run the command git checkout new-branch. Somebody also wrote a wrapper around this to give a git export. The prefix will be prepended to the output. Here, the -a option tells git to check out all files. Once a feature branch is finished and merged into the main branch, the changes in it become the main branch, until you merge a new feature branch into the main branch.Īt this point we have created a new branch, but are still located on the source branch. Or you can use git checkout-index which more closely resembles a 'checkout' of files: git checkout-index -f -a -prefix/some/path/. You're branching out a new set of changes from the main branch. A branch is like a tag, and the commits are shared. There are many other ways to do it but this is the simplest one I can remember. Make sure you have a space before and after the double hyphen. Note: Behind the scenes, Git does not actually create a new set of commits to represent the new branch. git checkout b6b94f2c19c456336d60b9409fb1e373036d3d71 - myfile.java Pass the commit ID AND the file name you want to restore. a set of changes has been committed on the feature branch – it is ready to be merged back into the master branch (or other main code line branch depending on the workflow in use). Other modern but centralized version control systems like Subversion require commits to be made to a central repository, so a nimble workflow with local branching and merging is atypical.Ī commonly used branching workflow in Git is to create a new code branch for each new feature, bug fix, or enhancement.Įach branch compartmentalizes the commits related to a particular feature. In legacy Version Control Systems (like CVS) the difficulty of merging restricted it to advanced users. This fundamentally improves the development workflow for most projects by encouraging smaller, more focused, granular commits, subject to rigorous peer review. There are a few more options, which you can read about in the git checkout man-page, all of which revolve around moving from one commit to another - just varying in what effect that move has in addition to moving HEAD.Git's distributed nature encourages users to create new branches often and to merge them regularly as a part of the development process - and certain Git workflows exploit this extensively.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |